寶啾寶石報報:GIA 發現合成鑽石有假鐳刻
GIA Reports Finding Lab-Grown Diamond with Fake Inscription 
  
 
 The Gemological Institute of America said that the 1.76-carat diamond   pictured at left was submitted with a fraudulent GIA inscription that   matches an actual GIA report from 2015 for a natural diamond. The report   number has been partially redacted for privacy reasons.  (Photos   courtesy of GIA/Photo credit: Troy Ardon) 
 
寶啾寶石坊也有裸鑽及有色寶石的銷售服務,也可以代客設計加工,歡迎來詢問,寶啾寶石坊提供最好的服務及最佳的價位。
Line 可詢問:http://line.me/ti/p/ZmdIHukNFI 
 Carlsbad, Calif.--In the latest issue of Gems & Gemology, the   Gemological Institute of America reported finding a man-made diamond   inscribed with a report number matching a mined diamond.
The article,   authored by Christopher M. Breeding and Troy Ardon, states that the   stone in question came through the lab's Carlsbad facility. 
A   client, whom the GIA did not identify in the article, submitted the   diamond for an updated grading report because they "noticed   inconsistencies" with the GIA report information, the article states.
The   diamond was inscribed with the number of a GIA report issued in 2015.   That report was for a natural, untreated diamond graded as 1.74 carats,   round brilliant cut, D color, Excellent cut grade and VVS1 clarity.
But   when graders looked at the stone, the article states they found it was a   round brilliant with Excellent cut grade but 1.76 carats, with F color   and VS1 clarity.
Moreover, the GIA's screening processes--which   are done on every stone to determine if it is natural, treated, lab   grown or a simulant--indicated that the diamond needed additional   testing to determine its origin.
Examination with the DiamondView   machine showed that the submitted stone was not a natural diamond but   was grown using the high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) process.
The   article also states that the FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) Spectra   showed that the natural diamond from the original report--the one that   matches the report number inscribed on the girdle of the man-made   stone--was Type IA (about 95 percent of natural diamonds are this type)   with aggregated nitrogen impurities, while the newly submitted diamond   was Type IIb with boron impurities.
In addition, the GIA said   upon closer examination, the font used for the number inscribed on the   diamond's girdle was different from the one used by GIA.
When   asked if the GIA was investigating the source and scope of this   fraudulent inscription, the lab said: "While we are aware of reports of   fraudulent inscriptions, we rarely encounter this type of blatant   fraud."
The lab added that the stone was returned to the   submitting client, which, it reiterated, was the one that noticed   inconsistences with the GIA report information and sent in the diamond   for an updated report.
In the article, the GIA advises members of   the trade with any doubt about some aspect of a diamond to send it to a   gem lab for verification.
 
留言
張貼留言